RESPONSE OF LOW FREQUENCY HARVESTING SYSTEMS OF RUBBER UNDER DRIER CLIMATIC CONDITIONS IN SRI LANKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31357/fesympo.v15i0.163Keywords:
Climate change, Ethephon, Hevea, Low frequency harvesting, RubberAbstract
Escalating cost of production (COP) and inadequate supply of skilled harvesters are among the major issues
that natural rubber industry face today. Low frequency harvesting (LFH) systems of which trees are tapped
in a lesser frequency than once in two days, are considered to be one of the solutions to overcome these
issues. With the focus given to expand rubber in drier climates, the present study was aimed to investigate
on the yield response of LFH systems, viz. harvesting trees once in three (d3), four (d4) and six (d6) days in
the intermediate zone (IZ) with the stimulation protocols developed for the wet zone (WZ). With the
decrease in harvesting frequency in IZ, yield per tree per tapping (GTT) increased, however yield per tree
per year (YPT) decreased. No such declines were observed in WZ. Stimulation had no negative impact on
percentage dry rubber content in latex (%DRC) or incidence of Tapping Panel Dryness. Whilst only the S/2
d3 system is acceptable for IZ in the present form, stimulation protocols are to be revised in other LFH
systems. Bark consumption was reduced significantly by LFH resulting in several long-term beneficial
effects. Effect of stimulation on latex physiology is also discussed.
Keywords: Climate change, Ethephon, Hevea, Low frequency harvesting, Rubber